Search
← Monetization
Monetization ~14 min read 2,683 words

Salt & Steel: Business Model

Document type: Design — Monetization
Status: Canonical
Last updated: 2026-04
See also: Pillars | Cosmetic MTX | Stash & Convenience | Voyage Packs

Overview

Salt & Steel is free to play. There is no purchase price, no subscription, and no premium tier that gates content. Every piece of gameplay — every island chain, every Voyage mechanic, every boss encounter, every GURPS-derived character option — is available to every player from day one regardless of whether they have ever spent a cent.

Revenue is generated through three streams: cosmetic customization purchases, organizational convenience upgrades (Cargo Hold tabs), and Voyage Supporter Packs released with each new seasonal expedition. Nothing sold through any of these streams affects the power of a character, the capability of a ship, the quality of a crew, or access to any content region.

This is not a reluctant concession to commercial reality. It is the only model under which Salt & Steel can be the game it commits to being. Pay-to-win is not a monetization variant of Salt & Steel. It is a different game, made by different people, for different reasons.

The Ethical F2P Commitment: Explicit and Binding

The following items are never for sale, directly or indirectly:

  • Character attribute points, skill points, or Advantage unlocks
  • Ship functional upgrade components or hull improvements
  • Crew quality, crew statistics, or crew recruitment advantages
  • Reputation boosts with any faction
  • Disadvantage buyoffs or character respec tokens with power implications
  • Access to any content region, Voyage storyline, or endgame system
  • XP accelerators, progression boosts, or drop rate multipliers
  • Any currency that can be converted into any of the above

This list is published on the Salt & Steel website before launch and updated in every patch note that touches the shop. When design decisions arise that test this list, the answer is the same every time: if it affects power, it is not for sale. This answer comes from every member of the team, not just from official communications. Pillar 5 sits at the top of the pillar hierarchy. It yields to nothing.

Revenue Streams

Stream 1: Cosmetic MTX

The primary revenue source. Salt & Steel's cosmetic shop sells visual customization for every dimension of the captain experience: character appearance, ship aesthetics, crew uniform themes, port hideout decoration, navigation interfaces, pets, emotes, and ability effect replacements.

This is where Salt & Steel's most significant commercial advantage over PoE becomes clear. PoE sells cosmetics for one thing: a humanoid character in a world of dungeons. Salt & Steel sells cosmetics for a captain, a ship, a crew, a port, and a living sea. The surface area for desirable cosmetic expression is dramatically larger.

Revenue characteristics:

  • Ongoing, transaction-by-transaction revenue
  • Variable by player spending preference (high engagement with collectors)
  • Driven by new release cadence, Voyage-themed content, and seasonal items
  • No depreciation — a purchased cosmetic retains its value and usability indefinitely

See Cosmetic MTX for the complete catalog and pricing framework.

Stream 2: Cargo Hold & Storage Convenience

The secondary revenue source, analogous to PoE's stash tab system. Salt & Steel ships with a base Cargo Hold capacity that is functional for all content progression. Premium Cargo Hold Expansions and Specialized Holds provide expanded and better-organized storage for players who engage deeply with multiple game systems simultaneously.

The fundamental distinction from PoE's model: Cargo Hold purchases are purely organizational. They do not provide trading advantages, and they do not gate any gameplay system. The base Cargo Hold is sufficient for every piece of content in the game. Specialized Holds save time and reduce friction for engaged players; they do not provide economic access that changes progression outcomes.

Revenue characteristics:

  • More universal among engaged players than cosmetics (many players buy zero cosmetics but appreciate organizational tools)
  • One-time purchase per account rather than recurring
  • Supplemented by periodic storage sales that drive conversion moments
  • Lower average transaction value than cosmetics; higher conversion rate

See Stash & Convenience for the full system design and the ethical line it draws.

Stream 3: Voyage Supporter Packs

Time-limited premium bundles released with each Voyage launch. Voyage Packs are the highest-revenue events in Salt & Steel's commercial calendar — concentrated purchase moments aligned with peak player excitement and new content enthusiasm.

Each Voyage Pack contains Voyage-themed exclusive cosmetics (ship skins, character outfits, crew sets, pets), a points allocation, and account-level recognition of support. Higher tiers include all lower-tier content plus additional items. Packs are available for purchase during the Voyage window and close when the next Voyage is announced.

Revenue characteristics:

  • Periodic high spikes aligned with Voyage launches (four times per year)
  • Captures players at maximum engagement and excitement moments
  • Time-limited availability creates genuine purchase urgency without dark-pattern manipulation
  • Scales across tiers from accessible ($30) to collector-grade ($200+)

See Voyage Packs for tier structure, content design, and the FOMO analysis.

The Surface Area Advantage: Why S&S Can Generate More Cosmetic Revenue Than PoE

This is the most commercially significant structural difference between Salt & Steel and Path of Exile, and it is worth stating plainly: Salt & Steel has more things players will want to make look beautiful.

Path of Exile sells cosmetics for:

  • A humanoid character (armor, helmet, gloves, boots, back attachment)
  • Weapon effects
  • Skill effects
  • Hideout decorations
  • Pets (small companions)
  • Portal effects

Salt & Steel sells cosmetics for all of that, plus:

Ships — the single largest cosmetic category in the game, with no equivalent in any ARPG. A ship skin is not a character skin resized. It is hull design, sail patterns, figurehead styling, flag and colors, wake effects, lantern glow, cannon visual effects, and boarding ramp aesthetics. A premium ship skin is a complete environment that the player sails through the world in — one of the most visually prominent and socially visible objects in the entire game. Ship skins are the highest-value individual cosmetic items S&S sells, and they have no comparable item in PoE's catalog.

Crew cosmetics — PoE has no crew. A uniformed crew in the colors of a specific aesthetic package transforms the visual experience of naval combat and boarding actions entirely. Crew cosmetics are both personally expressive and collectively visible to other players during multiplayer voyages.

Port Hideout — PoE has hideout decoration, but a pirate port has docks, ships-at-berth, island geography, tavern interiors, flag pennants, and the texture of a maritime base of operations. The Port Hideout is a larger, more theatrically diverse environment than PoE's cave-and-ruin hideouts.

Navigation cosmetics — compass rose styles, map overlay themes, spyglass skins, and chart aesthetics. These are interface cosmetics that players spend significant time looking at during the Voyage meta-layer. No equivalent exists in PoE.

Ability effects tied to maritime magic — salt-and-iron spell effects, tide magic, sea-wind channeling, ghost-light navigation. These are as diverse as PoE's skill effects but themed to a unique aesthetic language with no prior visual precedent, making each premium effect feel genuinely new.

Emotes and shanties — crew singing animations, captain dance emotes, and the unique mechanic of crew shanties that play during sailing. PoE sells emotes; S&S sells musical performances by a procedurally named crew.

The sum of these categories means that a player in Salt & Steel who loves the cosmetic system has roughly three to four times as many distinct categories to spend on as a PoE player. Each category can sustain its own themed content releases across multiple Voyages. The cosmetic catalog never exhausts the available surface area.

Financial Sustainability Analysis

Comparison to PoE's Demonstrated Viability

GGG sustained Path of Exile on the ethical F2P model for over a decade. The model funded:

  • Continuous league development at 3-4 month cadence
  • Console ports (Xbox, PS4/PS5)
  • Multiple major expansions
  • The complete separate development of Path of Exile 2 as a standalone game
  • A growing studio that reached 200+ employees

This is the empirical proof of concept. The ethical F2P model works at scale when the game is good enough that players want to support it. Salt & Steel's model is designed on the same principles with an expanded cosmetic surface area.

Revenue Per Active Player Estimate

For modeling purposes, using PoE industry estimates as a baseline:

PoE's active playerbase (peak concurrent players, not all-time accounts) in strong league periods has been estimated at 100,000-200,000 concurrent, with a broader engaged playerbase several times larger. Revenue per engaged player per year has been estimated by industry analysts at $20-60 (with significant variance by spending tier).

Salt & Steel's larger cosmetic surface area — particularly ship skins as a premium category with no PoE equivalent — provides structural reasons to expect higher average revenue per engaged player. A player who might spend $40/year in PoE on character cosmetics might spend $60-80/year in Salt & Steel if they love their ship's appearance and want crew uniforms to match.

The Spending Distribution Model

Like all F2P games, Salt & Steel will have a spending distribution:

  • Non-spenders (estimated 60-70% of active playerbase): Play free. Contribute to population density, community vitality, and word-of-mouth marketing. Essential to the ecosystem; not the commercial engine.
  • Light spenders (estimated 15-20%): Purchase one or two Cargo Hold upgrades, perhaps one supporter pack tier per year. Average spend: $30-60/year.
  • Engaged spenders (estimated 10-15%): Regular cosmetic purchases, full Cargo Hold setup, mid-tier supporter packs each Voyage. Average spend: $100-200/year.
  • Collector spenders (estimated 2-5%): Extensive cosmetic collection, ship skins for multiple builds, full supporter pack tiers. Average spend: $300-600+/year.

The commercial model does not need the majority to spend. It needs the game to be good enough that the 25-30% who do spend feel good about doing so, return each Voyage, and recommend the game to friends who join the base.

Voyage Cadence as Commercial Rhythm

Four Voyages per year is the commercial heartbeat. Each Voyage launch is:

  • A press and community moment (new mechanic reveal, new aesthetic)
  • A player reengagement event (lapsed players return for the fresh economy)
  • A Voyage Pack purchase window (concentrated revenue event)
  • A cosmetic release cycle (new themed items available in the shop)

This cadence sustains revenue across the year without artificial seasonal pressure. The gap between Voyages is not a revenue drought; it is when cosmetic shop and Cargo Hold sales carry the baseline. The spikes are the Voyage launches.

Expansion Revenue

Geographic expansions — new seas, new civilizations, new chart regions — are premium one-time purchases. These are not subscription content or season passes. A player buys an expansion once and has it forever on their Account Record. Expansion pricing is intentionally accessible: the commercial goal is broad adoption, not maximum per-purchase extraction.

Expansion revenue represents a meaningful but secondary commercial event, analogous to a large supporter pack at Voyage launch. The first expansion typically generates significant revenue from the established playerbase converting, with a long tail of new player purchases as the game grows.

Design Implications of the Model

Cosmetic Quality is Non-Optional

The commercial model requires excellent cosmetics. PoE's sustained revenue demonstrates this principle: players spend on cosmetics they find genuinely beautiful, interesting, or expressive. Cosmetics that are merely adequate generate no revenue; cosmetics that are genuinely desirable generate years of revenue.

This means the cosmetic art team is not a secondary consideration. Ship skin design, crew uniform artistry, and port hideout visual richness are commercial products. They must receive investment proportional to their commercial importance.

Base Aesthetics Must Be Excellent

Pillar 5 explicitly addresses this tension: if the most beautiful ships are all locked behind purchases, free players feel the gap between what they have and what they can see. This creates resentment, not aspiration.

The resolution, established in the pillars: base ships, base character appearances, and base port aesthetics must be excellent. Worn, detailed, characterful, and genuinely expressive of the captain fantasy. The cosmetic shop provides variations on excellence — not rescue from mediocrity. Every captain must look like a captain before spending a cent.

Practically, this means the base game ships receive the same art direction attention as premium cosmetics. Their rigging is detailed, their figureheads are characterized, their hull wear tells a story. A player sailing the base Sloop should feel proud of their ship. The premium ship skins should feel like different pride, not more pride.

Voyage Themes Drive Cosmetic Release Planning

Because Voyage themes (the Voyage of the Sunken Empire, the Voyage of the Crimson Tide) establish the aesthetic context for a 16-week season, cosmetic planning must be aligned with Voyage creative direction 6-12 months in advance. The cosmetic art team needs the Voyage creative brief before cosmetics can be designed.

This means cosmetic release planning is not separate from game content planning. They are entangled disciplines. The Voyage theme that drives new mechanics also drives the supporter pack aesthetic, the new ship skins in the shop, and the crew uniform themes available that season.

The Anti-P2W Constraint is a Creative Discipline

Maintaining the ethical F2P line forces the design team to make cosmetics desirable through artistic quality rather than through power advantage. This is a harder problem — it requires the cosmetics to be genuinely beautiful and personally expressive rather than merely useful. This constraint produces better cosmetics than pay-to-win design does, because the commercial pressure to make cosmetics desired falls entirely on their aesthetic merit.

Every time a designer proposes "what if this item also gave a small crew bonus," the answer is no, and the follow-up question is "how do we make this item so beautiful that players want it anyway?" That is the discipline the ethical model imposes, and it is the discipline that makes the game sustainable for a decade.

How the Model Evolves Over Time

Early Game (Years 1-2)

Revenue during launch is front-loaded. The initial player acquisition wave, the first Voyage pack purchases, and the first Cargo Hold tab conversions represent the highest-per-period revenue the game will see. This is not a problem — it is the natural structure of a new F2P game. The design challenge is sustaining revenue after the initial spike, which requires the game to be compelling enough that players return for subsequent Voyages.

Established Game (Years 3-5)

Revenue stabilizes around the Voyage cadence. Each new Voyage recaptures lapsed players (who bring a fresh purchase impulse), retains existing players (who continue their cosmetic collection), and continues to bring in new players (who make their first tab and cosmetic purchases). The cosmetic catalog becomes an increasingly rich historical archive with collector value.

Mature Game (Years 5+)

Geographic expansions have expanded the world. The player community includes veterans who have been on board since launch, each Voyage's supporter pack cosmetics serving as temporal markers of their history with the game. The highest commercial priority at maturity is not new-player acquisition (though it continues) — it is sustaining the engaged core's enthusiasm through excellent content. Players who have been playing for five years and still buy supporter packs each Voyage are the commercial foundation of a mature ethical F2P game.

What Mature PoE Proves

GGG's longevity is not an accident. The players who have been buying PoE supporter packs for eight years are not doing so because they feel manipulated. They are doing so because they love the game, trust the developers, and want the game to continue. That trust is built by never violating the ethical commitment — not once, not slightly, not "just this once" when financial pressure is real.

Salt & Steel inherits this lesson as its most commercially important design principle. Trust compounds. Betrayal destroys it instantly. Hold the line.

Cross-References